Pope Francis was admitted to Rome's Gemelli Hospital on February 14, 2025, with double pneumonia, and over the following two weeks underwent two acute crises that brought the Vatican closer to a public succession discussion than it has been in over a decade. The 88-year-old pope is, as of this writing, stable but seriously ill. The cultural attention has, predictably, returned to questions about Catholicism's future. The naming-data answer to that question is more interesting than the religious-news framing suggests. American Catholic-coded names have been growing faster than evangelical-coded names for fifteen years. The names work without the practice. The decoupling is the structural feature.
The decline that did not happen
If you had told an American naming demographer in 2000 that Catholic-coded names would dominate the next two decades of American naming, the demographer would have laughed. American Catholic religious participation in 2000 was already on a steep decline. Mass attendance had collapsed. Parochial-school enrollment had fallen sharply. Baptisms in the Catholic Church were down meaningfully across most US dioceses. By 2025, the numbers are worse — Catholic identification has dropped to about 20 percent of American adults from a 2000 baseline of about 25 percent, and active practice is much lower than identification.
And yet, over the same period, names with Catholic-coded heritage have been the dominant story in American baby naming. Theodore is in the top 30. Beatrice is in the top 200 and rising. Genevieve is climbing. Cecilia is rising. Augustine has appeared in the data with growing frequency. Frances is recovering. Margaret is stable. Vincent is climbing. Anthony has held its position. The names that the demographer would have predicted to fall with the practice are instead rising fast.
The decoupling thesis
The clean explanation is that the names have been decoupled from the practice. American parents in 2025 are choosing Theodore and Beatrice not as religious choices but as aesthetic and heritage choices. The names carry weight, history, vintage feel, classical resonance. The Catholic origin of the names is, in the decision-making moment, mostly invisible to the parents. They are reaching for something that sounds tasteful and weighted. The names happen to come from Catholic traditions because Catholic naming traditions had centuries to develop the kind of weighted classical name that 2025 parents are reaching for.
This is the same dynamic that produced the French Notre Dame recovery discussed earlier in this series. French parents are not, mostly, reclaiming Catholic naming as a religious practice. They are reclaiming it as a heritage practice that uses the religious aesthetic without requiring the religious commitment. The American story is structurally similar. The Catholic aesthetic is freely available to American parents who want classical-sounding names. The religious context that originally produced the aesthetic is not part of the package.
The evangelical comparison
The contrast with evangelical-coded naming is illuminating. American evangelical religious participation has held up better than Catholic participation over the past 25 years — evangelical identification has stayed roughly flat at about 25 percent of adults, and active practice has declined more slowly than the Catholic equivalent. If religious practice were the dominant driver of religious-coded naming, evangelical-coded names should be doing as well as or better than Catholic-coded names. They are not.
Evangelical-coded American names — Old Testament biblical names, names with explicit Christian theological content, names from Pentecostal and charismatic traditions — have grown more slowly through the 2010s and 2020s than Catholic-coded names. Names like Joshua, Jacob, Caleb, Joel, and the Old Testament stack have been stable or declining. Names with explicit Pentecostal coding have not registered movement. The faster-growing religious-coded names have been from Catholic traditions even though Catholic religious participation has been declining faster.
Why the asymmetry
The asymmetry is consistent with the decoupling thesis. Catholic-coded names are doing the heavy lifting for the broader vintage-revival aesthetic that drives current American naming. The names are old, classical, often Latin or Greek-rooted, often associated with European civilizational continuity. Parents reaching for that aesthetic find Catholic-coded names have the qualities they want. Evangelical-coded names, by contrast, are mostly Old Testament Hebrew names that read as more religiously specific. They do not work as well as decoupled aesthetic choices because the religious specificity is harder to detach.
This is, in some sense, the value of having a name pool that includes saints from many centuries, philosophers, classical figures, and various other categories that are available for non-religious adoption. Catholic naming inherits a deeper and broader pool than evangelical naming inherits. The deeper pool has more material for decoupled aesthetic adoption. The shallower pool of evangelical naming has less. The structural feature of the source determines how much can be decoupled.
What the Pope's illness specifically signals
Pope Francis's hospitalization is unlikely to produce a significant naming-bump effect on its own. Francis as a name has been stable in American naming for years, with growth tracking the broader vintage-revival trend rather than any specific reaction to the current pope's tenure. The hospitalization will be in the news for weeks. The naming consequences will be near zero in the data.
What the hospitalization will do is bring temporary attention to the broader Catholic-aesthetic naming territory. Parents who have been considering Catholic-coded names — Theodore, Frances, Genevieve, Vincent — may find their consideration accelerated by the cultural moment. The acceleration will be small and dispersed across many names. No single name will register a clean bump. The aggregate of the small accelerations will be visible in 2026 SSA data when it releases.
The long-running pope effect
Pope-naming dynamics have been studied in fragmented ways. Pope Benedict XVI's 2005 election produced a small but real bump in American Benedict naming, concentrated in 2005-2008 SSA data and fading thereafter. Pope John Paul II's tenure (1978-2005) produced sustained but modest support for John Paul as a paired naming choice in American Catholic families. The 2013 election of Pope Francis produced a small Francis bump that was almost entirely absorbed by the broader vintage-revival of Frances/Francis as a unisex name.
The 2025 succession, when it happens, will probably produce another modest naming effect tied to whichever name the new pope chooses. The Catholic Church has a tradition of papal name selection that draws on prior popes — a new pope might choose Leo (last used by Leo XIII, 1878-1903), Paul (Paul VI, 1963-1978), John (John XXIII, 1958-1963 and John Paul II), or various other classical options. The naming consequence in American data will track whichever name is chosen. Predictions are premature. The 2025 release will tell us what to watch for.
The American Theodore wave
The most striking piece of the decoupling story is Theodore. The name was rare in American usage in 2000 — outside the top 250, slowly declining. The name has, since 2010, climbed steadily to its 2024 position in the top 30. The growth rate is one of the fastest sustained climbs in modern SSA history. Theodore is, by Catholic-naming categorization, a saint name with multiple historical Theodores in the saint canon. The name is also a presidential name (Theodore Roosevelt) and a literary name (Theodore Geisel, Theodore Dreiser, Theodore Twombly). The cultural reference pool is rich.
What drives Theodore's specific climb is the combination of all those factors with the broader vintage-revival aesthetic. Parents reaching for Theodore are not, in interview studies, primarily citing Catholic saints or Roosevelt as their reasoning. They are citing the name's classical sound, its dignity, its Theo-as-cute-nickname potential, and its general feeling of being a real name with weight. The Catholic source is invisible to the chooser. The aesthetic capital it provides is fully extracted and is doing the work.
What this predicts for the next decade
The decoupling pattern suggests Catholic-coded names will continue their growth through the 2030s, possibly accelerating as the vintage-revival aesthetic continues to mature. The names that are currently mid-tier in the recovery — Cecilia, Beatrice, Augustine, Genevieve — will probably continue to climb. The top-tier of the recovery (Theodore, Margaret, Frances) will probably plateau as they reach saturation. New entrants from deeper Catholic naming traditions will emerge as parents reach for less-saturated alternatives. Names like Aloysius, Hilaria, Bartholomew, Jerome, and other deep-pool Catholic naming options may begin appearing in measurable numbers.
The evangelical-coded naming will continue at slower growth rates. The decoupling is harder for evangelical-coded names because the religious specificity is more recent and more concentrated. Old Testament names will be available for use but will not produce the same aesthetic premium that Catholic-coded names provide. The aesthetic-versus-religious distinction will continue to favor the deeper pool.
The Pope's role in this
Pope Francis, in his 12-year tenure, has been a culturally interesting pope but has not produced major naming-data effects. His health crisis in February 2025 will produce no major naming-data effects either. The pope's role in Catholic-coded naming is, paradoxically, peripheral. The names are being chosen by parents who are mostly not Catholic, in response to aesthetic considerations that are mostly not religious, in service of family-naming logic that is mostly not theological.
The pope's significance, in the data, is as a cultural marker that occasionally illuminates the underlying decoupling rather than driving it. His illness brings Catholicism into the news. The news provides a moment to examine why Catholic-coded names continue to do well even as Catholicism does not. The answer — that the names work without the practice — is one of the more important findings in modern American naming sociology, and it has been visible in the data for fifteen years for anyone willing to look. February 2025 is the moment when the question is most prominently in front of the public. The answer was already there.
Data source: U.S. Social Security Administration. Analysis by NamesPop.
Found this helpful?
Share it with someone who’s picking a name.